Deccan Chronicle article deliberately leads people to think that His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda is guilty of a crime that doesn’t even have a victim. A clear cognitive bias towards Hindu Gurus.
April 25, 2010
The baseless claims: The usage of ‘Sexual Tantric Practices’, ‘Discreet Tantra Sessions’ and ‘Non Disclosure Agreement’ is deliberately done to further sensationalize the controversy.
The fact is whatever is mentioned here is completely baseless and utter lies.
Please read more to find the truth.
His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda has pre-puberty testosterone level and his body is incapable of any sexual practice. Moreover till date, there has not been a single victim even named in the false rape case against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda that was filed in March 2010. The false complaint was filed by one Lenin Karuppan, an individual with vested interest, in March 2010. The complaint did not even carry the word rape or describe any such incident, but the section for rape – 376 was included in the complaint and an FIR was immediately registered! It was a mere plan that was being executed, to launch a systematic persecution against one of the greatest Hindu leaders ever. The complaint itself was a plan, so it did not have to carry any of its section elements in it. Months later, Lenin’s aide Aarathi Rao came in as witness in the case and said she was the rape victim! Further, the anti-Hindu conspirators also released a false video with morphed images of Paramahamsa Nithyananda and a South Indian actress to create a frenzy and hate campaign against Him.
It was the media mafia that were the channels of this religious persecution. In this article, one can see that Deccan Chronicle, a leading National daily has used suggestive and leading words to pre-program the minds of people against Paramahamsa Nithyananda, thereby exposing its own inherent cognitive bias. When media houses that have large readership as Deccan Chronicle carry such a bias, they effectively influence the public to carry the same bias. Therefore, their 1.45 million readers are programmed to be prejudiced against Hindu gurus and their followers. This type of stigmatization legitimizes religious discrimination and hate speech against Hindus.