17 March 2018
News Minute – on a focused character assassination of His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda, distorts His lawyer’s statements.
In the false rape case foisted on His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda, the false accuser Aarthi Rao changed her stand from ‘rape’ to ‘consensual sex’ the moment her statements were discredited by the USA courts where she filed a similar case against His Holiness. Medical tests done on His Holiness have clearly proven His impotency. However, in this News Minute article, it shows as if Counsel to His Holiness made a statement deterring from the earlier statement of impotency to saying it is ‘consensual sex’! The fact of the matter is, it was the false accuser Aarthi Rao who changed her words.
Aarthi Rao changed her statements multiple times, finally alleging it was ‘consensual’, when she was not able to get any evidence or traction on her bogus claims of rape. However, News Minute brazenly twists the story and spreads lies about His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda in an attempt to destroy His image and manipulate public opinion as a subliminal form of crowd control.
When people are continuously bombarded with such false information, they are programmed to not only believe these lies but also believe that Gurus are a threat to society and start harbouring animosity towards them. When this type of anti-Hindu rhetoric is spread by media, it plagues the public sentiment against all Hindu Gurus, legitimising religious persecution.
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:
Ma Bhaktika- Sir we are here to serve the humanity in whatever language we know. How does it matter whether we know Kannada or not ? And we are trying our best, we were talking in Kannada. He is trying to highlight that and create trouble in the hall. The whole trouble started because of nothing, because our own cameraman was shooting what, the press meet in our own ashram. They didn’t want him to shoot, they didn’t want him to record. What injustice is this sir, it is our ashram. And not only that we were quietly answering all the questions. He came with an intention to create trouble for us. And then if we say gunda’s attacked us yesterday, he is getting angry. They are gunda’s, they jumped over our gate and they came and our Administrative head is in the hospital today. A hundred stitches they put in the whole of the forehead. Then do we call them gunda’s or what. He is getting angry. In his house if 10 people jump over his gate and attack his wife and his daughter, will he call them gunda’s or what will he call them ? Tell them Maharaj.