Aarathi Rao, false rape accuser of His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda has changed her statement three times in the chargesheet – the first statement had no date or time of any of the alleged incidents of abuse, the second statement had random dates, and the third statement had dates and times which had been changed ‘after discussion with others’.
11 Nov 2011
Aarathi Rao, one of the chief conspirators in the planned persecution against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda, who pressed a false rape charge on Him citing multiple-times rape in several places around the world, has been continuously updating her dates and places of alleged rape to the CID!
Here, the webmaster of His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda raises a question: How will a woman be confused about the date and place of rape?
The webmaster cites a classic example from Aarathi Rao’s false rape charges to expose her lies. Aarathi Rao has said she was raped in place ‘A’ on a certain date whereas, His Divine Holiness was in another place ‘B’ on that day attending to some other program. There are video recordings of the same. The original itinerary got modified but the webmaster had not updated it in the website! So Aarathi Rao, who did her rape stories just off the published calendar, picked up the earlier date and earlier place and cited a rape instance!
How is it that Aarthi Rao has graphic details of all the alleged abuse incidents but she doesn’t remember only the dates when they happened or even where they happened?
Answer : Because the incidents are conjured up by her whereas the dates and times have to synch up with the whereabouts of His Divine Holiness!
One of Aarathi Rao’s changed statement is as follows:
“I could not recollect the details of all incidents accurately at the time of my earlier statements. To whatever extent I could remember them, I had given accurate information to the Investigating Officer. However, after talking to other ex-followers, who also had knowledge of the incidents, my memory was refreshed about the details of some incidents. Therefore I would like to correct the date of an incident mentioned in my initial statement.”
The lady doesn’t know her supposed rape date but others know about it and her memory was “refreshed” by them. Is this rape or orgy? What does she mean by changing the dates ‘after discussion with others’? Are the exact dates of her abuse better known to others than to herself?
So the fact of the matter is, Aarathi Rao wrote her rape stories to the CID by choosing dates and locations simply from an online travel calendar of His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda, and conjured up her own details of the rape and filed the false rape charges. Click to read more.
Below is the snapshot of Aarathi Rao’s updated statements in the chargesheet.
