The alleged rape victim’s extremely detailed medical records show her admitting to her personal physician on 3rd June 2010 (after her last alleged incident of rape in 2009). She was “concerned she had exposure to a new partner one year ago” and “wonders if through oral sex or episodes of vaginal intercourse she was exposed to sexually transmitted disease.” This is the same person who claimed to be a “traditional Indian woman”!
The alleged rape victim claims she was raped over 120 times by His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda from 2005 to 2009, and he had been her “partner” till 2009 . She claims she realized she was being ‘raped’ only in 2009 when she allegedly saw Paramahamsa Nithyananda with ‘another woman’ in the morphed video. This means Paramahamsa Nithyananda cannot be the “new partner” referenced in the medical report.
If Paramahamsa Nithyananda is not her “new partner”, her husband is not a “new partner”, then who was the new partner? This just shows the illicit and immoral character of Aarthi Rao who claims to be a “traditional Indian woman” as that is the only pivot for her allegations, the rest being factually disproven.
Now what kind of “traditional Indian woman” will go around sleeping with another man right after allegedly being raped?
The alleged rape victim was never raped by Paramahamsa Nithyananda. However, as her authenticated medical records show, she had extramarital affairs with at least one HIV positive man, which is why she herself had to be tested positive for HIV—as per the medical reports.