23 Nov 2017
Official Information from Directorate of Forensic Sciences – New Delhi (Documentary evidences) gave a SHOCKING revelation that the scandalous morphed video of His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda was never even submitted at any of the Central Forensic Sciences Labs – CFSL – in India for Examination/Analysis. It has exposed and consolidated the role of Paid Media in the Organised Media Trial against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda and Sanatana Hindu Dharma.
On 22nd November 2017, All National and regional News Media had broadcasted a sensational defamatory false news that the “Controversial Sex Scandal Video portraying Nithyananda and Actress Ranjitha in a compromising position is true” and that “The Central forensic Labs (CFSL) of Delhi and Hyderabad had conformed in the Video Analysis Reports”.
This defamatory and false news was also spread via Print media and Social Media Networks virally as a planned attack on His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda and Sanatan Hindu Dharma.
https://nithyanandatruth.org/2017/11/22/attack-by-indian-media-by-manipulated-reporting-about-the-morphed-video
In an attempt to expose the false media trial, an RTI (Right to Information Act) application was applied to the ‘Directorate of Forensic Sciences – New Delhi’ on 23 Nov 2017, seeking information regarding the Analysis reports of Controversial Sex Scandal Video, portraying Paramahamsa Nithyananda and Actress Ranjitha in a compromising position. Below is the RTI application submitted with pertinent questions asked.
The questions asked via RTI was:
- Has any Video been sent to the CFSL for analysis for any Investigation process which portrays Paramahamsa Nithyananda and Actress Ranjitha?
- If Yes, which Department and/or Personnel requested for the analysis report and when was the request made?
- Have the Analysis of that Video been completed and report sent to the Personnel/Concerned Authority? If yes When was it sent?
- If the Report is available for public view please send the Digitally Signed soft copy or True Certified Copy of the Report.
- If the Report is Subjudiced and not meant for Public viewing then how the TV media had access to the Information. The media never mentioned/showed any proof of document, for the information they had broadcasted. They only mentioned the source of information as Central Forensic Science Labs – Delhi (CFSL). Is the Information given by the Media houses True and Authentic?
The Directorate of Forensic Sciences Lab – New Delhi had forwarded the above said RTI Application to the Central Public Information Officers (CPIO) of CFSL Labs of Chandigarh, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Guwahati, Bhopal, Pune and also CFSL CBI – New Delhi, to give appropriate Information.
The Reply/Information from each CFSL Lab is given below:
- 27 November 2017
CFSL Pune: – “No information is available in this office for your queries numbering 1 to 5”
- 04 December 2017
CFSL Kolkata: – “No Information is available in this Laboratory”
- 06 December 2017
CFSL Chandigarh: – “No such case has been received in this Laboratory for Examination. And no such information is available in Material Form”.
- 12 December 2017
CFSL Bhopal: – “No Information is available in material form”
- 06 December 2017
CFSL Guwahati: – “In this regard the requisite Information with respect to this laboratory is NIL”
- 03 January 2018
CFSL Hyderabad:- “This Laboratory does not have any Information related to the questionnaire. Hence the information may please to be treated as NIL”
- 05 January 2018
CFSL CBI – New Delhi:- The CPIO of CFSL CBI – New Delhi had asked for the FIR details if they had to provide any information. After the FIR details was provided the following reply was given by the CFSL CBI
– New Delhi;“This is to inform you that no record or request for the forensic examination in the respect of the FIR numbers stated by you was received in CFSL CBI New Delhi.”
CONCLUSION:
The Official Reply/Information from the Directorate of Forensic Sciences – New Delhi, via various CFSL Labs including the CFSL-Hyderabad and CFSL CBI-New Delhi categorically proves the following truth,
- No video portraying His Divine Holiness Paramhamsa Nithyananda and the Actress had been submitted in any of the CFSL Labs throughout India. It proves the whole false ‘Paid Media trial’.
- The Hyderabad and Delhi Labs had also confirmed that no such information available in their Labs. This Proves that the whole fake and defamatory news that was broadcasted by the Media Mafia, is an intentional act to conspire against Paramahamsa Nithyananda.
- Also, this proves that the planned attack against Paramhamsa Nithyananda and Sanatana Hindu Dharma was done by Anti-Hindu, Anti-National and Anti-Social Elements backed by the unethical and corrupt ‘Paid Media houses’. The Official Documents from CFSL Labs have once again proved and exposed the conspiracy of False Paid Media Trial against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda.
This revelation puts a big question mark on the credibility of Paid Media Houses and wakes us up to the existence of international Anti-Hindu forces whose vested interest is to destabilize Sanatana Hindu Dharma.
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:
Question: Swamiji you made a very big statement saying that the CD which was released was morphed but it was tested from the very reputed agency FSL in Hyderabad in Hyderabad, they say that CD is genuine
Swamiji: Can I can I answer two things, first chain of custody the no FSL lan can speak the authenticity of any video without having the clear understanding about the chain of custody when it was shot where it was kept see
You Can answer,yes
I would like to say a few things about the video. First of all many of you might be relying upon a CFSL report and we saying that if CFSL laboratory is confirming that this is authentic, this means authentic but unfortunately the CFSL laboratory should never have even touched this video because the video has a date on it.
That date happens to be 25th of December 2009 and the CFSL received the video some time in May and the Chennai police receive the video on 4th of March 2010. Between 25th December 2009 and 4th March 2010,nobody knows the whereabouts of this video and for any video to be called evidence there is something known as a chain of custody. A laboratory should be in the position to pinpoint where this video was between 25th of December 2009 and the 4th of March 2010. The laboratory simply has no such information because nobody in the world knows where this video was doing what in that period.
CFSL should have never touched this but having actually touched the video having actually given a certain report many things actually come into doubt. First and foremost what is the basis for CFSL to say that this is genuine because this is digital video you are dealing with digital video to speak of .Number one this is not analogue, number two-the authenticity of a distilled video is always open to doubt and question. It is only approximate and nobody can be certain, not even CFSL is certain and it would be inappropriate for anybody outside of CFSL to say that yes this is true. And also lawyers and forensic scientist in the United States are now going through this video they don’t have the entire video with them, they have actually the clippings of the video and they are startled actually to find out that in India that thing like this is believed by the masses and they are saying that they will give an affidavit very shortly to say that video is only morphed.They are saying that the quantum of light actually generated by the video is the exact quantum that is necessary to morph the video and to create a reasonable doubt to the naked eye.So there are several inconsistencies that they have pointed out and unfortunately I cannot give you the exact inconsistency. But I will give you a reference,there is a timestamp in the video that time stamp says 8 o’clock in the morning but the video has an alarm clock,alarm clock says 11 o’clock in the morning.Now when video timestamp becomes 8 o’clock, if I go from 8 o’clock to 8:15 what do you think the alarm clock in the video should be displaying? 11:15 but unfortunately it does not display 11:15, it displays 3:30. Number 2, there is a network that is being shown, there is a television that is playing inside the video,there is a particular network actually that is playing on the television and the forensic scientist in the United States are now saying that they have ascertained that, that particular network never telecast that particular program on that day. But what they are all baffled with is that is the choice of the day 25th of December 2009 maybe we all miss the significance of that day because this is an arbitrary date, for a person who would morph actually any one of the 365 days in the year would be valid why on earth that they choose 25th of December 2009 or for that matter 25th of December. The lawyers, forensic scientists in the US are actually baffled they just don’t understand, why 25th of December- all the dates in the world. Because they believe 25th of December is a sacred day for them. That’s the birthday of Lord Jesus the Christ and there are furthermore inconsistencies. The video specifically, the charge sheet lists out the maker and manufacturer of the video. And the scientists in the United States they have been able to find out the speed at which the video shoots,it is something like 30 frames per second. And they say for a speed like this there is a table fan that is captured inside the video and they basically have calculated the speed of the blade within the table fan and they are saying when the video shoots at 30 frames per second and when a still is taken out of that video, the Blade should appear in a certain way but the blade is appearing in the exact,opposite way and these are the things that will be given later in the form of an affidavit for all those who would want to believe that the video is genuine. The video is not genuine and the video represents an extraordinary digital manipulation. Because it is, if we want to believe yes they took 2 months, one might want to wonder, what was the video doing in those two months, In those 2 months and there are 7-8 other inconsistencies unfortunately I am not been authorised to divulge those inconsistencies at this point of time.But I just wish to tell you this, Hollywood would be delighted because it is believed that the people in the US are saying the video represents finest Hollywood work and all Hollywood labs would be delighted once basically they realise that people believe this is true, this is real that is all. Thankyou.
* END OF TRANSCRIPT *