9 June 2010
Without a shred of evidence, Deccan alleges that the morphed video has been proven to be authentic. They are not able to even cite a single forensic source but make such arbitrary claims, ignoring the fact that the morphed video has no relevance to the case at all.
Deccan Chronicle claims that “this is the first evidence against Nithyananda” and then contradicts themselves in the next sentence by saying, “but it does not strengthen the case as not even one victim has deposed before the CID against him. They know full well that the actress falsely portrayed in the video has both denied the authenticity of it and has denied any kind of sexual abuse by her beloved Guru, Paramahamsa Nithyananda. And as a result, the CID has yet to identify a single victim. However, DC continuously promotes such headlines to intentionally sway public opinion against Paramahamsa Nithyananda and run a systematic character assassination on Him. Whether the case has a victim or not is not highlighted, only this anti-Hindu propaganda is seen in the public eye.