See the court ruling. “Dismissed with prejudice” means the false accusations were so ridiculous, they are barred from ever being brought up again.
Court dismisses all of Vinay’s allegations, and condones him for making charges which he NEVER could substantiate, despite being compelled to do so in court.
Meanwhile while Vinay refused to testify to substantiate any of his bogus claims, he DID try his best to prevent any actual credible witnesses appearing in court to discredit him. The court dismissed his attempts as frivolous.
Now keep in mind, Vinay had a clever tactic of dragging things out and trying to buy more time, with the wonderful excuse that he was busy fighting child sexual abuse charges for which he was facing jail time and didn’t have time to testify in court.
However, USA courts are smarter than that. They clearly pointed out that he made his charges and had time to testify long before his current legal mess. Nice try Vinay.
Trying to milk the legal system for all it’s worth Vinay later tried to appeal this judgement against him, and his future appeal is DENIED and dismissed with prejudice, which in legal terms basically means that he can’t even try to take it back to court again.