The false rape victim’s medical record on 19 July 2005 says: “…in a monogamous relation with her husband.” How does she say that she is in a monogamous relationship if she had alleged sexual relations with Paramahamsa Nithyananda?
Paramahamsa Nithyananda, who knew about her STDs (as she had come to him for healing for the same in 2004), applied to the Court to procure the medical records of the false victim, which was essential to prove his innocence in the false case for which he was facing a life sentence. The State of Michigan 22nd Judicial District Court issued a subpoena (judicial order) to the University of Michigan Hospitals (where she went for medical treatment from at least 2004) to release her medical records. This was when it was revealed that she was suffering with four highly contagious and incurable STDs, all variations of the Herpes virus.
Her medical record on 19 July 2005 says: “…in a monogamous relation with her husband.”
However, she later claims that she was raped by Nithyananda from 1st December 2005 till 2009. Then, according to her medical records as of 3 June 2010, she has had a “new” partner in the past year.
“The patient is concerned she had exposure to a new partner 1 year ago and reports using condoms for contraception. She wonders if through oral sex or that episodes of vaginal intercourse she was exposed to sexually transmitted disease.”
This sexually transmitted disease is HIV – Human Immunodeficiency Virus, the virus responsible for AIDS. When he underwent medical tests for STDs himself, Nithyananda clearly came out with negative results for ALL STDs – including the 4 variations for Herpes, and HIV.
So, she admits she had a ‘new partner’ in 2009, had oral sex and vaginal intercourse with this person who was HIV positive. In July 2005 after multiple incidents of her alleged rape, the false rape victim says she is in a monogamous relation with her husband. Then in 2010, she says she has a ‘new partner’ since 2009, after all the incidents of alleged rape. Then by her own admission where is the question of Swami Nithyananda having any kind of alleged relationship with her?